GLPwatch

Efficacy and safety of autoinjected exenatide once-weekly suspension versus sitagliptin or placebo with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: The DURATION-NEO-2 randomized clinical study.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2017

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a 28-week study of 365 people with type 2 diabetes on metformin, those given exenatide once-weekly injections saw a 1.13% drop in blood sugar control (HbA1c) compared to a 0.75% drop with sitagliptin and a 0.40% drop with placebo. More exenatide users (43.1%) reached healthy blood sugar levels (HbA1c under 7%) than sitagliptin (32%) or placebo (24.6%) users. Both exenatide and sitagliptin reduced fasting blood sugar and body weight, while placebo did not. The most common side effects with exenatide were stomach issues and injection-site reactions.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2017
Citations44
Relative citation ratio1.66
NIH percentile68
Molecules exenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

AIMS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors treat type 2 diabetes through incretin-signaling pathways. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once-weekly (Miglyol) suspension for autoinjection (QWS-AI) with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin or placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre study of patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, 365 patients were randomized to receive exenatide 2.0 mg QWS-AI, sitagliptin 100 mg once daily or oral placebo (3:2:1 ratio). The primary endpoint was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 28 weeks. RESULTS: At 28 weeks, exenatide QWS-AI significantly reduced HbA1c from baseline compared to sitagliptin (-1.13% vs -0.75% [baseline values, 8.42% and 8.50%, respectively]; P  = .02) and placebo (-0.40% [baseline value, 8.50%]; P = .001). More exenatide QWS-AI-treated patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% than did sitagliptin- or placebo-treated patients (43.1% vs 32.0% and 24.6%; both P  < .05). Exenatide QWS-AI and sitagliptin reduced fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 28 weeks (-21.3 and -11.3 mg/dL) vs placebo (+9.6 mg/dL), with no significant difference between the 2 active treatments. Body weight decreased with both active treatments (-1.12 and -1.19 kg), but not with placebo (+0.15 kg). No improvement in blood pressure was observed in any group. The most common adverse events with exenatide QWS-AI were gastrointestinal events and injection-site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that exenatide QWS-AI reduced HbA1c more than sitagliptin or placebo and was well tolerated.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 28205322 ↗

Related research