Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Daily Administered GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom.
Diabetes Ther · 2017
Last updated 2026-05-28A study compared the long-term cost-effectiveness of three daily GLP-1 drugs—liraglutide 1.2 mg, exenatide 10 µg twice daily, and lixisenatide 20 µg once daily—for type 2 diabetes in the UK. Over time, liraglutide led to slightly better quality-adjusted life years (9.19 vs. 9.17 and 9.12) and lower total costs (£36,394 vs. £36,547 and £36,496) compared to the other two drugs.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Ther, 2017 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 16 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.80 |
| NIH percentile | 43 |
| Molecules | — |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist class has grown in the last decade, with several agents available in the UK. However there is currently a paucity of evidence regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of liraglutide 1.2 mg versus other daily administered GLP-1 receptor agonists, due to a lack of head-to-head trial data. Therefore the present analysis was performed, using results from a network meta-analysis (NMA), to compare the cost-effectiveness of three currently available daily administered GLP-1 receptor agonists for treatment of diabetes in the UK setting.
METHODS: A validated and published diabetes model was used to make long-term projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2015 GBP) for patients receiving liraglutide 1.2 mg once-daily, exenatide 10 μg twice daily and lixisenatide 20 μg once-daily. Treatment effects were taken from an NMA evaluating the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and were applied in a cohort based on the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes 6 (LEAD-6) trial. Costs and utilities were based on published sources.
RESULTS: Liraglutide 1.2 mg was associated with improved quality-adjusted life expectancy versus exenatide [9.19 versus 9.17 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] and lixisenatide (9.19 versus 9.12 QALYs). Improvements were driven by benefits in glycemic control, leading to a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications. Liraglutide 1.2 mg was associated with reduced costs versus exenatide (GBP 36,394 versus GBP 36,547) and lixisenatide (GBP 36,394 versus GBP 36,496), with cost savings as a result of complications avoided entirely offsetting increased acquisition costs. Based on the projected outcomes, liraglutide was found to be dominant over both exenatide and lixisenatide.
CONCLUSION: Liraglutide 1.2 mg is likely to be considered cost-effective versus alternative daily administered GLP-1 receptor agonists for treatment of type 2 diabetes in the UK.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 28058656 ↗