No benefit of additional treatment with exenatide in patients with an acute myocardial infarction.
Int J Cardiol · 2016
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 191 patients with a first-time heart attack, those given exenatide (a GLP-1 drug) did not have smaller heart damage compared to those given a placebo. The average heart damage was 37.1% in the exenatide group and 39.3% in the placebo group, a difference that was not statistically significant. The treatment did not cause any major heart-related side effects during hospitalization.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Int J Cardiol, 2016 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 38 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.38 |
| NIH percentile | 62 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction, Heart Failure |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This double blinded, placebo controlled randomized clinical trial studies the effect of exenatide on myocardial infarct size. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has possible cardioprotective properties during reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
METHODS: 191 patients were randomly assigned to intravenous exenatide or placebo initiated prior to percutaneous coronary intervention using 10μg/h for 30min followed by 0.84μg/h for 72h. Patients with a previous myocardial infarction, Trombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 2 or 3, multi-vessel disease, or diabetes were excluded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to determine infarct size, area at risk (AAR) (using T2-weighted hyperintensity (T2W) and late enhancement endocardial surface area (ESA)). The primary endpoint was of 4-month final infarct size, corrected for the AAR measured in the acute phase using MRI.
RESULTS: After exclusion, 91 patients (age 57.4±10.1years, 76% male) completed the protocol. There were no baseline differences between groups. No difference was found in infarct size corrected for the AAR in the exenatide group compared to the placebo group (37.1±18.8 vs. 39.3±20.1%, p=0.662). There was also no difference in infarct size (18.8±13.2 vs. 18.8±11.3% of left ventricular mass, p=0.965). No major adverse cardiac events occurred during the in-hospital phase.
CONCLUSION: Exenatide did not reduce myocardial infarct size expressed as a percentage of AAR in ST elevated myocardial infarction patients successfully treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 27394978 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.