GLPwatch

Insights from cardiovascular outcome trials with novel antidiabetes agents: what have we learned? An industry perspective.

Curr Diab Rep · 2015

Last updated 2026-09-05

In 2008, the FDA required studies to test the heart safety of new diabetes drugs. Four recent trials tested three DPP-4 inhibitors (saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin) and one GLP-1 drug (lixisenatide) in people with type 2 diabetes who had heart disease or were at high risk. The results showed these drugs did not change the risk of major heart events like heart attack or stroke compared to a placebo.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalCurr Diab Rep, 2015
Citations17
Relative citation ratio0.62
NIH percentile35
Molecules —

Abstract

Owing to the close association of cardiovascular (CV) disease with type 2 diabetes and the uncertainty surrounding the CV safety of antidiabetes agents, in 2008 the Food and Drug Administration issued guidance for the demonstration of CV safety for new antidiabetes drugs. Recently the results from CV outcomes trials of three dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have been reported. The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR) trial, the Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin versus Standard of Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndrome (EXAMINE) trial, and the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) assessed the safety of saxagliptin, alogliptin, and sitagliptin, respectively, in patients with type 2 diabetes with CV disease or at high risk for CV disease. The Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ELIXA) assessed the safety of lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and a recent acute coronary syndrome event. The results show that these agents neither increased nor deceased major adverse CV events (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) compared with placebo. However, the resources needed to conduct these studies may detract from the ability to understand the potential long-term benefit and risk in the majority of patients that are candidates for use of these medications.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 26370698 ↗