Design of FLAT-SUGAR: Randomized Trial of Prandial Insulin Versus Prandial GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Together With Basal Insulin and Metformin for High-Risk Type 2 Diabetes.
Diabetes Care · 2015
Last updated 2026-05-28In a 6-month study of 102 people with high-risk type 2 diabetes, researchers compared two treatments: continued basal-bolus insulin (BBI) or a combination of basal insulin, a prandial GLP-1 drug, and metformin. The goal was to see which treatment better controlled blood sugar fluctuations, measured by continuous glucose monitoring, while keeping HbA1c levels between 6.7% and 7.3%. The average participant was 62 years old, had diabetes for 15 years, and had an HbA1c of 7.9% at the start.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Care, 2015 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 27 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.02 |
| NIH percentile | 51 |
| Molecules | — |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Glycemic variability may contribute to adverse medical outcomes of type 2 diabetes, but prior therapies have had limited success in controlling glycemic fluctuations, and the hypothesis has not been adequately tested.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: People with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk were enrolled during a run-in period on basal-bolus insulin (BBI), and 102 were randomized to continued BBI or to basal insulin with a prandial GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLIPULIN) group, each seeking to maintain HbA(1c) levels between 6.7% and 7.3% (50-56 mmol/mol) for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring; other measures were HbA(1c), weight, circulating markers of inflammation and cardiovascular risk, albuminuria, and electrocardiographic patterns assessed by Holter monitoring.
RESULTS: At randomization, the mean age of the population was 62 years, median duration of diabetes 15 years, mean BMI 34 kg/m(2), and mean HbA(1c) 7.9% (63 mmol/mol). Thirty-three percent had a prior cardiovascular event, 18% had microalbuminuria, and 3% had macroalbuminuria. At baseline, the continuous glucose monitoring coefficient of variation for glucose levels was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: FLAT-SUGAR is a proof-of-concept study testing whether, in a population of individuals with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk, the GLIPULIN regimen can limit glycemic variability more effectively than BBI, reduce levels of cardiovascular risk markers, and favorably alter albuminuria and electrocardiographic patterns. We successfully randomized a population that has sufficient power to answer the primary question, address several secondary ones, and complete the protocol as designed.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 26068865 ↗