Evaluation of the Dual-Chamber Pen Design for the Injection of Exenatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.
J Diabetes Sci Technol · 2015
Last updated 2026-05-28A dual-chamber pen was designed to deliver exenatide once weekly for type 2 diabetes treatment. In tests, the pen accurately delivered the target dose (650 µL ± 10%) and met force requirements. Most untrained healthcare practitioners (87%) and patients (87%) correctly completed setup, dose preparation, and injection steps, with ease-of-use scores averaging 5.8 to 6.5 out of 7.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2015 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 15 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.69 |
| NIH percentile | 38 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exenatide once weekly, an injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has been shown to reduce A1C, fasting glucose, and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. Exenatide 2.0 mg is dispersed in poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) polymer microspheres, which require resuspension in aqueous diluent before subcutaneous injection. A single-use, dual-chamber pen was developed to improve the convenience of exenatide once weekly delivery and tested following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance.
METHODS: Design development goals were established, and validation tests (dose accuracy, torque/force requirements, usability, and ease-of-use) were performed. Dose accuracy was tested under a variety of conditions. After 10 exploratory studies in 329 patients, the final design's usability and ease-of-use were tested in untrained health care practitioners (HCPs; n = 16) and untrained/trained patients (n = 30/17). Usability testing evaluated completion of multiple setup, dose preparation, and injection steps. Ease-of-use impression was assessed using a scale of 1-7 (1 = very difficult, 7 = very easy).
RESULTS: The dual-chamber pen successfully met development goals and delivered target volume (650 µL ± 10%) under tested conditions (mean 644.7-649.3 µL), with torque and force requirements below prespecified maximum values. In the final user study, most participants (≥87%) correctly completed pen setup, dose preparation, and injection steps. Mean ease-of-use scores were 5.8, 6.3, and 6.5 out of 7 in untrained HCPs, untrained patients, and trained patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: With self-education or minimal training, participants accurately and precisely suspended, mixed, and delivered exenatide-containing microspheres using the dual-chamber pen with high ease-of-use scores. The dual-chamber pen was FDA-approved in February 2014.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 25759181 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.