Effect of bariatric surgery combined with medical therapy versus intensive medical therapy or calorie restriction and weight loss on glycemic control in Zucker diabetic fatty rats.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol · 2015
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of rats with advanced Type 2 diabetes, two types of weight-loss surgeries—Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG)—both improved blood sugar control compared to medical therapy or calorie restriction. Both surgeries reduced the need for insulin to keep blood sugar below 15 mmol/l, but RYGB showed slightly better long-term results than SG, though it also carried a higher risk of dangerously low blood sugar.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 2015 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 14 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.50 |
| NIH percentile | 29 |
| Molecules | — |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity |
Abstract
Bariatric surgery rapidly improves Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our objective was to profile and compare the extent and duration of improved glycemic control following Roux-en-Y gastric (RYGB) bypass surgery and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and compare against calorie restriction/weight loss and medical combination therapy-based approaches using the Zucker diabetic fatty rat (ZDF) rodent model of advanced T2DM. Male ZDF rats underwent RYGB (n = 15) or SG surgery (n = 10) at 18 wk of age and received postsurgical insulin treatment, as required to maintain mid-light-phase glycemia within a predefined range (10-15 mmol/l). In parallel, other groups of animals underwent sham surgery with ad libitum feeding (n = 6), with body weight (n = 8), or glycemic matching (n = 8) to the RYGB group, using food restriction or a combination of insulin, metformin, and liraglutide, respectively. Both bariatric procedures decreased the daily insulin dose required to maintain mid-light-phase blood glucose levels below 15 mmol/l, compared with those required by body weight or glycemia-matched rats (P < 0.001). No difference was noted between RYGB and SG with regard to initial efficacy. SG was, however, associated with higher food intake, weight regain, and higher insulin requirements vs. RYGB at study end (P < 0.05). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in several rats after RYGB. RYGB and SG significantly improved glycemic control in a rodent model of advanced T2DM. While short-term outcomes are similar, long-term efficacy appears marginally better after RYGB, although this is tempered by the increased risk of hypoglycemia.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 25540099 ↗