Drug induced acute pancreatitis: does it exist?
World J Gastroenterol · 2014
Last updated 2026-05-28About 25% of acute pancreatitis cases have no clear cause at diagnosis. Over 100 drugs have been reported in case studies as possible triggers, but these reports are often weak and can lead to overdiagnosis. Drug-induced pancreatitis is rare, and relying too much on these reports can cause confusion and delay finding the real cause of the condition.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | World J Gastroenterol, 2014 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 39 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.84 |
| NIH percentile | 71 |
| Molecules | — |
Abstract
As the incidence of acute pancreatitis continues to rise, establishing the etiology in order to prevent recurrence is important. Although the etiology of acute pancreatitis is not difficult in the majority of patients, almost a quarter of patients are initially labeled as having idiopathic acute pancreatitis. When confronted with a patient with acute pancreatitis and no clear etiology defined as an absence alcoholism, gallstones (ultrasound and/or MRI), a normal triglyceride level, and absence of tumor, it often appears reasonable to consider a drug as the cause of acute pancreatitis. Over 100 drugs have been implicated by case reports as causing acute pancreatitis. While some of these case reports are well written, many case reports represent poorly written experiences of the clinician simply implicating a drug without a careful evaluation. Over-reliance on case reports while ignoring randomized clinical trials and large pharmacoepidemiologic surveys has led to confusion about drug induced acute pancreatitis. This review will explain that drug induced acute pancreatitis does occur, but it is rare, and over diagnosis leads to misconceptions about the disease resulting in inappropriate patient care, increased litigation and a failure to address the true entity: idiopathic acute pancreatitis.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 25469020 ↗