Substitution of insulin by exenatide in bad controlled type 2 diabetic patients: efficacy and predictive factors.
Minerva Endocrinol · 2015
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 36 people with type 2 diabetes and poor blood sugar control, 70% saw their HbA1c levels drop by at least 1% after switching from insulin to exenatide combined with oral medications. Among those who responded, average HbA1c fell from 9.9% to 7.6% after 3 months, and 10 maintained this improvement after 9 months. Factors like shorter diabetes duration, higher C-peptide levels, and lower fasting blood glucose after 3 days of exenatide were linked to better responses.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Minerva Endocrinol, 2015 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 1 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.04 |
| NIH percentile | 4 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
AIM: Exenatide therapy is indicated in type 2 diabetes after failure of oral antidiabetic agents (OAD). The aim of this observational prospective study was to assess efficacy of exenatide, in improving HbA1c of at least of 1% (responders) in type 2 diabetic patients treated previously with insulin.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients (HbA1c >7.5%), with chronic bad glycemic control, were hospitalized to improve glycemia using transient continuous insulin infusion followed by administration of exenatide and OAD agents. In these patients, insulin had been introduced previously because of OAD failure without any sign of severe insulin deficiency.
RESULTS: On the 27 patients analyzed at 3 months, 19 patients were responders (HbA1c: M0: 9.9±1.7%; M3: 7.6±1.2%). Among the 8 non-responders, only 4 deteriorated their HbA1c. After 9 months, 10 patients remained Responders (HbA1c: 7±0.9%). Predictive factors for an improvement of glycemic control were: diabetes duration shorter than 12 years, ratio fasting glycemia/C-peptide less than 1, fasting C-peptide higher than 2.0 µg/L and mean capillary blood glucose after 3 days of exenatide lower than 200 mg/dL. These criteria remained valid in case of a high HbA1c at baseline.
CONCLUSION: In patients with no signs of insulin dependence and in case of insulin failure, exenatide associated to OAD may be tried in order to improve glycemic control, this objective was reached by 70% of our patients. Predictive factors for good response, easily available in clinical practice, may help therapeutic choices.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 25003223 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.