Cost-effectiveness of add-on treatments to metformin in a Swedish setting: liraglutide vs sulphonylurea or sitagplitin.
J Med Econ · 2014
Last updated 2026-05-28A Swedish study compared the long-term cost-effectiveness of adding liraglutide to metformin against adding either glimepiride (a sulphonylurea) or sitagliptin for people with type 2 diabetes not well controlled on metformin alone. Liraglutide cost between SEK 226,000 and SEK 255,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained compared to glimepiride, and between SEK 149,000 and SEK 161,000 compared to sitagliptin. The model predicted that liraglutide could reduce complications like kidney disease, stroke, and heart failure by about 20%, but it also increased overall treatment costs.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Med Econ, 2014 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 20 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.83 |
| NIH percentile | 44 |
| Molecules | liraglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-run cost-effectiveness in a Swedish setting for liraglutide compared with sulphonylureas (glimepiride) or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with metformin in monotherapy.
METHODS: The IHE Cohort Model of Type 2 Diabetes was used to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes from a societal perspective. Model input data were obtained from two clinical trials, the Swedish National Diabetes Register and the literature. Cost data reflected year 2013 price level. The robustness of results was checked with one-way-sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: The cost per QALY gained for liraglutide (1.2 mg) compared to SU (glimepiride 4 mg), both as add-on to metformin, ranged from SEK 226,000 to SEK 255,000 in analyzed patient cohorts. The cost per QALY for liraglutide (1.2 mg) vs sitagliptin (100 mg) as second-line treatment was lower, ranging from SEK 149,000 to SEK 161,000. Costs of preventive treatment were driving costs, but there was also a cost offset from reduced costs of complications of ∼ 20%. Notable cost differences were found for nephropathy, stroke, and heart failure. The predicted life expectancy with liraglutide increased the cost of net consumption for liraglutide.
LIMITATIONS: The analysis was an ex-ante analysis using model input data from clinical trials which may not reflect effectiveness in real-world clinical practice in broader patient populations. This limitation was explored in the sensitivity analysis. The lack of specific data on loss of production due to diabetes complications implied that these costs may be under-estimated.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies with liraglutide 1.2 mg improved the expected quality-of-life and increased costs when compared to SU and to sitagliptin for second-line add-on treatments. The cost per QALY for liraglutide was in the range considered medium by Swedish authorities.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 24950434 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide.