Large-molecule quantification: sensitivity and selectivity head-to-head comparison of triple quadrupole with Q-TOF.
Bioanalysis · 2013
Last updated 2026-05-28A study compared two types of mass spectrometers—high-resolution (HRMS) and triple quadrupole—for measuring six peptides, including exenatide. The HRMS instrument showed equal or better sensitivity for all tested compounds when used for targeted quantification. The research suggests HRMS is a viable option for accurately measuring large molecules in regulated settings.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Bioanalysis, 2013 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 50 |
| Relative citation ratio | 2.23 |
| NIH percentile | 77 |
| Molecules | — |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bioanalysts are continuously looking for innovative ideas or instruments to increase the sensitivity and selectivity of their assays. Research for better mass spectrometers is becoming crucial with the emerging trend of large-molecule quantification. This study lists the different advantages of high-resolution MS (HRMS) over standard triple quadrupole instruments and proposes basic guidelines on how to use HRMS for large-molecule quantification in a regulated environment.
RESULTS: A direct comparison between HRMS and triple quadrupole instruments for the quantification of six different model peptides (desmopressin, calcitonin, enfuvirtide, exenatide, glucagon and somatostatin) was completed. The HRMS instrument, when used specifically for targeted quantification ('quant/quant'), showed equivalent or better sensitivity for all compounds tested.
CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that the use of a HRMS instrument in a regulated environment is a viable technique for quantification of large molecules. The latter was able to allow flexibility and selectivity to adapt the specificity of each assay with sensitivity comparable to the triple quadrupole instrument.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 23721442 ↗