The cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly compared with exenatide twice daily and insulin glargine for the treatment of patients with type two diabetes and body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) in Spain.
J Med Econ · 2013
Last updated 2026-05-28A study in Spain compared the cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly (EQW) to exenatide twice daily (EBID) and insulin glargine (IG) for treating type 2 diabetes in patients with a BMI of 30 or higher. EQW was found to be less costly and more effective than EBID, while EQW cost €12,084 more per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared to IG. The results remained consistent even when testing different scenarios.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Med Econ, 2013 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 22 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.87 |
| NIH percentile | 46 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly (EQW) for the treatment of type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Spain. EQW was compared against exenatide twice daily (EBID) and insulin glargine (IG).
METHODS: The IMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes for patients with T2DM treated with EQW, EBID, and IG. Treatment effects and patient baseline characteristics were taken from the DURATION 3 and pooled DURATION 1 and 5 studies, in the comparison against IG and EBID, respectively. Unit costs and health state utility values were derived from published sources. To reflect diabetes progression, patients started on EQW or EBID, switching to insulin glargine after 3 years. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service over a time horizon of 35 years with costs and outcomes discounted at 3%. The base case included patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m(2), which is in line with current prescription restrictions in Spain. Uncertainty was addressed through extensive one-way sensitivity analyses around key model parameters and a comprehensive probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: When compared with EBID, EQW was the dominant strategy, i.e., less costly and more effective. When compared to IG, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at €12,084 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the model projections were robust to the various scenarios tested.
LIMITATIONS: Primary limitations of the analysis are common to other T2DM analyses and include the extrapolation of short-term clinical data to the 35 year time horizon and uncertainty around optimum treatment durations.
CONCLUSION: The analyses indicate that EQW is a cost-effective option for the treatment of T2DM patients in Spain for patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m(2) considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 per QALY gained.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 23659201 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.