GLPwatch

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Exp Diabetes Res · 2011

Last updated 2026-05-28

A review of 36 clinical trials found that GLP-1 receptor agonists did not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes. The overall risk was slightly lower than with placebo or other treatments, but the difference was not statistically significant. In placebo-controlled trials, the risk was significantly lower, while in trials comparing active treatments, the risk was similar.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalExp Diabetes Res, 2011
Citations95
Relative citation ratio2.99
NIH percentile84
Molecules
Conditions studied Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Data from randomized clinical trials with metabolic outcomes can be used to address concerns about potential issues of cardiovascular safety for newer drugs for type 2 diabetes. This meta-analysis was designed to assess cardiovascular safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists. DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists (versus placebo or other comparators) with a duration ≥12 weeks, performed in type 2 diabetic patients. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (MH-OR) was calculated for major cardiovascular events (MACE), on an intention-to-treat basis, excluding trials with zero events. RESULTS: Out of 36 trials, 20 reported at least one MACE. The MH-OR for all GLP-1 receptor agonists was 0.74 (0.50-1.08), P = .12 (0.85 (0.50-1.45), P = .55, and 0.69 (0.40-1.22), P = .20, for exenatide and liraglutide, resp.). Corresponding figures for placebo-controlled and active comparator studies were 0.46 (0.25-0.83), P = .009, and 1.05 (0.63-1.76), P = .84, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To date, results of randomized trials do not suggest any detrimental effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular events. Specifically designed longer-term trials are needed to verify the possibility of a beneficial effect.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 21584276 ↗