Application of DBS for quantitative assessment of the peptide Exendin-4; comparison of plasma and DBS method by UHPLC-MS/MS.
Bioanalysis · 2010
Last updated 2026-05-28Researchers tested a new method using dried blood spots (DBS) to measure levels of the peptide Exendin-4, a drug similar to GLP-1 drugs. The DBS method required much less blood (about 5 microliters) than the traditional plasma method (150 microliters) and was more sensitive, with a detection range of 10 to 2000 ng/ml compared to 20 to 2000 ng/ml for plasma. The DBS method also showed better stability and did not need extra processing steps that the plasma method required.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Bioanalysis, 2010 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 27 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.18 |
| NIH percentile | 56 |
| Molecules | — |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An investigation was performed in order to establish if dried blood spots (DBS) could be applied to the quantitation of biopharmaceuticals in biological matrices and perform equivalently in terms of accuracy, precision and stability to traditional plasma methods.
RESULTS: A method was successfully validated for the peptide Exendin-4 (39 amino acids in length) utilizing DBS technology. The validated DBS method resulted in a more sensitive and simplistic method than an existing monkey plasma method and required tenfold less sample volume. The final DBS method resulted in a 10-2000-ng/ml linear calibration range using approximately 5 µl of dried blood, compared with the plasma method in which 150 µl of plasma coupled with SPE sample preparation resulted in a 20-2000-ng/ml linear calibration range. Although not needed for DBS, SPE was required for the plasma method to reduce endogenous matrix interferences and achieve desired LLOQ. Matrix stability was also enhanced by the implementation of the DBS platform when compared with either plasma or whole blood.
CONCLUSION: DBS technology can be utilized for the quantitation of biopharmaceuticals and offer advantages over traditional plasma-based methods.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 21083346 ↗